Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (novel) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) OliveYouBean (talk) 01:17, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cold Fusion (novel)

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (Doctor Who)

Articles for deletion/Cold Fusion (novel) (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having looked at the previous AfD, looked through the sources, and done a WP:BEFORE search, I do not think this article satisfies WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. None of the online sources constitute significant independent coverage, and the offline source I was able to access (AHistory) only contains a two-paragraph plot summary in the context of a timeline of the fictional universe of Doctor Who (weirdly this source doesn't actually support all of the text it purports to support). OliveYouBean (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. OliveYouBean (talk) 09:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This was one of the most consequential of the Missing Adventures novels, and it received a subsequent audio adaptation as well. It satisfies WP:GNG. The DWM review by David Owen is substantial. The book is also covered in David J Howe's "The Who Adventures" (Telos Publishing, ISBN 9781845831851). The article could do with some improvement; I'll see about finding more resources. Bondegezou (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some work expanding the article, including adding several citations of various sorts: there's a primary source [1], and some shorter references [2][3][4], as well as two longer online articles [5][6] and a review in the magazine Starburst (magazine) of the audio adaptation.[7] I'll try to do some more later. Bondegezou (talk) 11:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY and improvements made after nomination. Jclemens (talk) 19:44, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.